What would people do if they knew that the natural state of an economy is falling costs for everyone? For entrepreneurs, for families, for individuals, for communities, for society as a whole.

What would change if they understood that technological progress should make everything structurally cheaper over time? That the normal direction of a productive society is reduction of costs, not permanent pressure?

If you do not immediately see why this is true, let me show you mathematically.

If productivity doubles while the money supply remains constant, the cost per unit must fall by half. If productivity triples while the money supply remains constant, the cost per unit must fall to one third. Price is the ratio between money and goods. If goods increase while money remains constant, the ratio declines. More goods divided by the same number of monetary units means lower prices. This is arithmetic.

So in a world where productivity continuously increases, for example, with AI, the structural direction of costs should be downward. Salaries should buy more over time. Businesses should face declining operating costs. Families should need fewer working hours to afford the same things. Communities should experience expanding relief as basic costs shrink generation after generation.

But that is not what we experience.

Why?

Because the unit used to measure and pay for everything, money, can be created in larger quantities. More units of money can be created by central banks and by commercial banks through credit expansion. When new units are introduced into the system, the denominator changes. Even if productivity increases, the expansion of the money supply prevents the natural reduction in costs from appearing. The gain that should lower prices for everyone is extracted by a few before it spreads through society.

The pressure remains. The relief never fully arrives. Now return to the original question.

What would people do if they clearly understood this? If they understood that their personal stress, their family’s financial pressure and many tensions in society are not isolated problems, but symptoms of a money that can be expanded and used by a few to extract productivity gains.

Would they accept it quietly? Would they demand change? Would there be protests? Political upheaval? Revolutions?

Or would people begin by questioning the foundation itself? Would they start tracing rising costs back to the measuring tool? Would they finally see that much of the strain in their own lives is not lack of effort, but the consequence of using a money that allows the gains of productivity to be captured by a few before they reach everyone?

If enough people understood this clearly, the consequences would not stay theoretical. They would reshape how society thinks about money, power and legitimacy.

*Original article: *https://bitcoinawareness.substack.com/p/if-people-knew-this-what-could-happen

We publish articles on Substack to educate normies on Bitcoin and money. Subscribe and share.